Provincial Housing Changes (Bill 44)
North Cowichan has changed its Zoning Bylaw to comply with the Provincial Legislation – Bill 44: Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023. As of June 19, 2024, three to four dwelling units are permitted on most residential lots within the urban areas.
Use the following flow chart to see how your property is impacted, and refer to the interactive web map and how to guide to learn if your property is inside or outside the urban containment boundary.
Although most properties are still in the same zone as they were before this bylaw amendment, several new zones were created, and some zones were removed. The following table explains the zone changes that occurred:
North Cowichan has changed its Zoning Bylaw to comply with the Provincial Legislation – Bill 44: Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023. As of June 19, 2024, three to four dwelling units are permitted on most residential lots within the urban areas.
Use the following flow chart to see how your property is impacted, and refer to the interactive web map and how to guide to learn if your property is inside or outside the urban containment boundary.
Although most properties are still in the same zone as they were before this bylaw amendment, several new zones were created, and some zones were removed. The following table explains the zone changes that occurred:
Have a question about the zoning changes? Ask it here.
Questions will be answered within three to four business days. Please note that this is general information, if you have specific questions about your property we recommend you contact Planning staff.
-
Share Single-family dwellings are now allowed a basement suite in a residential area. My concern is parking. Does the homeowner need to provide off-road parking for tenants and their visitors? Can the homeowner and his company now park in a no-parking zone before his home so the tenant uses the driveway? Will Bylaws follow up on reports of violations? Do these suites need to be registered with North Cowichan and does the homeowner need to declare a rental income on his property for income taxes? Thank you. on Facebook Share Single-family dwellings are now allowed a basement suite in a residential area. My concern is parking. Does the homeowner need to provide off-road parking for tenants and their visitors? Can the homeowner and his company now park in a no-parking zone before his home so the tenant uses the driveway? Will Bylaws follow up on reports of violations? Do these suites need to be registered with North Cowichan and does the homeowner need to declare a rental income on his property for income taxes? Thank you. on Twitter Share Single-family dwellings are now allowed a basement suite in a residential area. My concern is parking. Does the homeowner need to provide off-road parking for tenants and their visitors? Can the homeowner and his company now park in a no-parking zone before his home so the tenant uses the driveway? Will Bylaws follow up on reports of violations? Do these suites need to be registered with North Cowichan and does the homeowner need to declare a rental income on his property for income taxes? Thank you. on Linkedin Email Single-family dwellings are now allowed a basement suite in a residential area. My concern is parking. Does the homeowner need to provide off-road parking for tenants and their visitors? Can the homeowner and his company now park in a no-parking zone before his home so the tenant uses the driveway? Will Bylaws follow up on reports of violations? Do these suites need to be registered with North Cowichan and does the homeowner need to declare a rental income on his property for income taxes? Thank you. link
Single-family dwellings are now allowed a basement suite in a residential area. My concern is parking. Does the homeowner need to provide off-road parking for tenants and their visitors? Can the homeowner and his company now park in a no-parking zone before his home so the tenant uses the driveway? Will Bylaws follow up on reports of violations? Do these suites need to be registered with North Cowichan and does the homeowner need to declare a rental income on his property for income taxes? Thank you.
Homeowner asked 5 months agoThank you for the question. In most residential zones, 1 off-street parking space is required per suite and 2 spaces are required for the main house. The rules for on-street parking are listed in the traffic bylaw and as posted by the Municipality. These rules have not changed because of the changes to the zoning bylaw. Violations should be reported to bylaw@northcowichan.ca and Bylaw Enforcement staff will follow up.
Every new suite or other dwelling unit must obtain a building permit from the Municipality prior to construction. These units are not registered, but the information about the property is recorded and per-unit services fees, such as the fees for waste collection, apply. The rules regarding taxes due on rental income are established by the Canada Revenue Agency.
-
Share What is the maximum floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit? Or does it go by lot coverage? on Facebook Share What is the maximum floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit? Or does it go by lot coverage? on Twitter Share What is the maximum floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit? Or does it go by lot coverage? on Linkedin Email What is the maximum floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit? Or does it go by lot coverage? link
What is the maximum floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit? Or does it go by lot coverage?
ConnectAdmin asked 4 months agoThe maximum size for the detached accessory dwelling unit is 120m2 (see section 40.4 of the zoning bylaw, starting on page 39), but there are a few things to keep in mind that will make the maximum size smaller in many cases:
- You also need to meet the parcel coverage restriction. If you are already close to the maximum parcel coverage (because of the size of your main house relative to the size of the property) you may need to keep the accessory dwelling smaller.
- The 120m2 is for the whole accessory building. For example if you had a workshop on the ground floor and the dwelling above the workshop, the dwelling would end up being smaller than 120m2.
-
Share SSMUH legislation states that, "A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or 1 detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) must be permitted in "Restricted Zones" in ALL municipalities and regional district electoral areas." This legislation further states that a Restricted Zone is defined as lots "[historically] recognized as single-family or duplex lots". With this in mind, it is unclear why North Cowichan has used the UBC as a deciding factor on whether or not to implement this legislation. Rather, they should be using the definition of "Restricted Zone". For example, by using the UBC and not the Restricted Zone, most of the R1 zone in North Cowichan appears to be left out of the new legislation. However, this should not be the case. All of R1 should be permitted ""A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or ADU" per the new legislation, regardless of whether is or is not in the UCB. Further restrictions, such as private septic and/or water systems should not factor into this equation. In fact, I recall that most of R1, at least in Chemainus and Crofton, is indeed on public water systems. The SSMUH legislation was put forward in good faith that municipalities would not apply additional restrictions. Please clarify North Cowichan's decision to leave most of R1 outside of the new legislation. on Facebook Share SSMUH legislation states that, "A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or 1 detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) must be permitted in "Restricted Zones" in ALL municipalities and regional district electoral areas." This legislation further states that a Restricted Zone is defined as lots "[historically] recognized as single-family or duplex lots". With this in mind, it is unclear why North Cowichan has used the UBC as a deciding factor on whether or not to implement this legislation. Rather, they should be using the definition of "Restricted Zone". For example, by using the UBC and not the Restricted Zone, most of the R1 zone in North Cowichan appears to be left out of the new legislation. However, this should not be the case. All of R1 should be permitted ""A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or ADU" per the new legislation, regardless of whether is or is not in the UCB. Further restrictions, such as private septic and/or water systems should not factor into this equation. In fact, I recall that most of R1, at least in Chemainus and Crofton, is indeed on public water systems. The SSMUH legislation was put forward in good faith that municipalities would not apply additional restrictions. Please clarify North Cowichan's decision to leave most of R1 outside of the new legislation. on Twitter Share SSMUH legislation states that, "A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or 1 detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) must be permitted in "Restricted Zones" in ALL municipalities and regional district electoral areas." This legislation further states that a Restricted Zone is defined as lots "[historically] recognized as single-family or duplex lots". With this in mind, it is unclear why North Cowichan has used the UBC as a deciding factor on whether or not to implement this legislation. Rather, they should be using the definition of "Restricted Zone". For example, by using the UBC and not the Restricted Zone, most of the R1 zone in North Cowichan appears to be left out of the new legislation. However, this should not be the case. All of R1 should be permitted ""A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or ADU" per the new legislation, regardless of whether is or is not in the UCB. Further restrictions, such as private septic and/or water systems should not factor into this equation. In fact, I recall that most of R1, at least in Chemainus and Crofton, is indeed on public water systems. The SSMUH legislation was put forward in good faith that municipalities would not apply additional restrictions. Please clarify North Cowichan's decision to leave most of R1 outside of the new legislation. on Linkedin Email SSMUH legislation states that, "A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or 1 detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) must be permitted in "Restricted Zones" in ALL municipalities and regional district electoral areas." This legislation further states that a Restricted Zone is defined as lots "[historically] recognized as single-family or duplex lots". With this in mind, it is unclear why North Cowichan has used the UBC as a deciding factor on whether or not to implement this legislation. Rather, they should be using the definition of "Restricted Zone". For example, by using the UBC and not the Restricted Zone, most of the R1 zone in North Cowichan appears to be left out of the new legislation. However, this should not be the case. All of R1 should be permitted ""A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or ADU" per the new legislation, regardless of whether is or is not in the UCB. Further restrictions, such as private septic and/or water systems should not factor into this equation. In fact, I recall that most of R1, at least in Chemainus and Crofton, is indeed on public water systems. The SSMUH legislation was put forward in good faith that municipalities would not apply additional restrictions. Please clarify North Cowichan's decision to leave most of R1 outside of the new legislation. link
SSMUH legislation states that, "A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or 1 detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) must be permitted in "Restricted Zones" in ALL municipalities and regional district electoral areas." This legislation further states that a Restricted Zone is defined as lots "[historically] recognized as single-family or duplex lots". With this in mind, it is unclear why North Cowichan has used the UBC as a deciding factor on whether or not to implement this legislation. Rather, they should be using the definition of "Restricted Zone". For example, by using the UBC and not the Restricted Zone, most of the R1 zone in North Cowichan appears to be left out of the new legislation. However, this should not be the case. All of R1 should be permitted ""A minimum of 1 secondary suite and/or ADU" per the new legislation, regardless of whether is or is not in the UCB. Further restrictions, such as private septic and/or water systems should not factor into this equation. In fact, I recall that most of R1, at least in Chemainus and Crofton, is indeed on public water systems. The SSMUH legislation was put forward in good faith that municipalities would not apply additional restrictions. Please clarify North Cowichan's decision to leave most of R1 outside of the new legislation.
ed asked 4 months agoYou are correct that the R1 zone is considered a restricted zone and the legislation applies whether or not it is within the Urban Containment Boundary (UCB). You are also correct that the legislation requires that the municipality permits either a secondary suite and/or a detached accessory dwelling unit in all restricted zones (including the R1 zone). Municipalities have the choice of whether to permit the required second unit as a secondary suite or a detached accessory dwelling unit, we do not have to permit both. Since our R1 zone already permits a suite (the term used in the bylaw in this zone is a two-family dwelling), it was already compliant with the legislation without need to change the zoning.
For areas within the UCB, 3-4 dwelling units must be permitted per lot (as opposed to the 2 dwellings required in the rural areas) which is why these areas have been treated separately in the zoning bylaw.
Because the legislation required that the zoning to be changed quickly, our approach to implementing the legislation was to generally make the minimum changes necessary to comply. The municipality has started a comprehensive review of the zoning bylaw which will be an opportunity to look at different options such as whether to allow detached ADUs in the R1 zone.
-
Share Are separate titles possible on these additional units? on Facebook Share Are separate titles possible on these additional units? on Twitter Share Are separate titles possible on these additional units? on Linkedin Email Are separate titles possible on these additional units? link
Are separate titles possible on these additional units?
John Pite asked 5 months agoYes, depending on the circumstances.
Inside of the urban containment boundary, newly constructed duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes can be stratified so that each unit can be owned separately.
The answer is a more complicated for adding additional units to an existing residence or when constructing a detached accessory dwelling unit (a.k.a., garden suite, coach house…). We recommend seeking professional advice (such as from a lawyer or surveyor) to discuss your specific proposal.
In general, a strata plan (which creates multiple separate titles) must be registered when the units are complete but before they are occupied. If one or more units is already occupied (even if it is in a separate building as it would be for a new detached accessory dwelling unit), then it is considered a strata conversion and a subdivision application (building strata) is required. For a strata conversion to be approved you must meet several requirements including upgrading all units to substantially comply with the current building code – which can be difficult to achieve for older buildings.
-
Share All of this increased density and population will have an impact on all of our resources - roads & transportation, water services, sewer, etc. What steps are being taken to ensure that the current level of services are maintained? Who is paying for all of the upgrades to our systems that will become necessary? on Facebook Share All of this increased density and population will have an impact on all of our resources - roads & transportation, water services, sewer, etc. What steps are being taken to ensure that the current level of services are maintained? Who is paying for all of the upgrades to our systems that will become necessary? on Twitter Share All of this increased density and population will have an impact on all of our resources - roads & transportation, water services, sewer, etc. What steps are being taken to ensure that the current level of services are maintained? Who is paying for all of the upgrades to our systems that will become necessary? on Linkedin Email All of this increased density and population will have an impact on all of our resources - roads & transportation, water services, sewer, etc. What steps are being taken to ensure that the current level of services are maintained? Who is paying for all of the upgrades to our systems that will become necessary? link
All of this increased density and population will have an impact on all of our resources - roads & transportation, water services, sewer, etc. What steps are being taken to ensure that the current level of services are maintained? Who is paying for all of the upgrades to our systems that will become necessary?
mah44463 asked 5 months agoAll new units, including secondary suites and detached accessory dwelling units (a.k.a., garden suites, coach houses…) are required to pay development cost charges (DCCs). DCCs are collected and pooled to pay for any new infrastructure that is required because of new development.
The Municipality is currently working on a comprehensive review of our infrastructure taking into consideration the impact of the new legislated density requirements. This review will result an updated list of near- and long-term infrastructure projects and updated DCC rates.
The Municipality also regularly advocates to senior levels of government and submits grant applications to try to offset costs of infrastructure replacement and upgrades.
-
Share I live on Haida rd. It's zoned r3. Does that mean if the house across the street wants to build a 4 plex. Could I lose my view and the tranquility of my quiet neighborhood and will this impact the value of my home causing me to lose some of my investment? on Facebook Share I live on Haida rd. It's zoned r3. Does that mean if the house across the street wants to build a 4 plex. Could I lose my view and the tranquility of my quiet neighborhood and will this impact the value of my home causing me to lose some of my investment? on Twitter Share I live on Haida rd. It's zoned r3. Does that mean if the house across the street wants to build a 4 plex. Could I lose my view and the tranquility of my quiet neighborhood and will this impact the value of my home causing me to lose some of my investment? on Linkedin Email I live on Haida rd. It's zoned r3. Does that mean if the house across the street wants to build a 4 plex. Could I lose my view and the tranquility of my quiet neighborhood and will this impact the value of my home causing me to lose some of my investment? link
I live on Haida rd. It's zoned r3. Does that mean if the house across the street wants to build a 4 plex. Could I lose my view and the tranquility of my quiet neighborhood and will this impact the value of my home causing me to lose some of my investment?
Brad asked 5 months agoThank you for the question. You are correct, Haida Rd. is within the R3 zone so a fourplex can be constructed on properties in your neighbourhood. The maximum permitted height in the R3 zone has not changed and is still 9.0m, although property owners can request a variance to the zoning rules. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that views will always remain free of development and change.
The change to allow fourplexes is widespread and affects properties throughout British Columbia including thousands of properties in North Cowichan. Since it is not specific to any one neighbourhood, any impact to property values would likely affect most/ all properties in the same way. Many factors can play a part in determining property values, however new housing developments do not generally have a negative impact on the surrounding property values. In 2018, a BC Housing study found that even relatively large-scale non-market housing developments did not have a negative impact on property values for the neighbouring community.
-
Share I already have a house with a suite, can I build a detached accessory dwelling unit (e.g., garden suite, laneway house, carriage house) as well? on Facebook Share I already have a house with a suite, can I build a detached accessory dwelling unit (e.g., garden suite, laneway house, carriage house) as well? on Twitter Share I already have a house with a suite, can I build a detached accessory dwelling unit (e.g., garden suite, laneway house, carriage house) as well? on Linkedin Email I already have a house with a suite, can I build a detached accessory dwelling unit (e.g., garden suite, laneway house, carriage house) as well? link
I already have a house with a suite, can I build a detached accessory dwelling unit (e.g., garden suite, laneway house, carriage house) as well?
ConnectAdmin asked 5 months agoIf your property is located within the urban containment boundary, in most cases the answer is yes. For zones that permit 3 or 4 units, the new zoning allows a detached accessory dwelling unit in addition to a single-family dwelling with or without a suite. Please review the draft zoning bylaw to see the regulations that apply (such as how big the accessory unit can be, where it can be located, how much total parcel coverage is allowed…).
-
Share What if I don't want to increase the density of my property? Can anyone stop me from building a single-family dwelling? on Facebook Share What if I don't want to increase the density of my property? Can anyone stop me from building a single-family dwelling? on Twitter Share What if I don't want to increase the density of my property? Can anyone stop me from building a single-family dwelling? on Linkedin Email What if I don't want to increase the density of my property? Can anyone stop me from building a single-family dwelling? link
What if I don't want to increase the density of my property? Can anyone stop me from building a single-family dwelling?
ConnectAdmin asked 5 months agoThat’s totally okay: you do not need to make any changes to your property because of this zoning change.
Single-family dwellings are still permitted in all the low-density residential zones. If you are building on a new lot or wanting to replace your existing home, you are not required to build additional units; the new regulations simply give you the option to do so.
-
Share Why aren’t Detached Accessory Dwelling Units permitted on all residential parcels in the Municipality? on Facebook Share Why aren’t Detached Accessory Dwelling Units permitted on all residential parcels in the Municipality? on Twitter Share Why aren’t Detached Accessory Dwelling Units permitted on all residential parcels in the Municipality? on Linkedin Email Why aren’t Detached Accessory Dwelling Units permitted on all residential parcels in the Municipality? link
Why aren’t Detached Accessory Dwelling Units permitted on all residential parcels in the Municipality?
ConnectAdmin asked 5 months agoWith the current zoning changes, detached accessory dwelling units are permitted on almost all residential parcels within the urban containment boundary. Outside of the urban containment boundary many of the agricultural zones already allow a second detached dwelling on properties that are over 2 hectares (5 acres).
It is mainly the rural residential zones that do not permit a detached accessory dwelling unit. Because our rural residential zones do not need to be changed to comply with the Bill 44 requirements, allowing detached accessory dwelling units in these zones was not included as part of this project. A comprehensive review of the Municipality’s zoning bylaw is underway and this issue will be looked at as part of the comprehensive review project.
Who's Listening
-
-
CH
Lifecycle
-
Phase 1: Small Scale Multi Units Housing Zoning
Provincial Housing Changes (Bill 44) has finished this stageSpring 2024
-
Phase 2: Interim Housing Needs Report
Provincial Housing Changes (Bill 44) is currently at this stageFall 2024
-
Phase 3: Pro-active planning for 20-year housing supply
this is an upcoming stage for Provincial Housing Changes (Bill 44)2025
Document library
- Interim Housing Needs Report (2024) (675 KB) (pdf)
- Interactive Web Map How To.pdf (759 KB) (pdf)
- Zoning Amendment Bylaw 3964 (11.1 MB) (pdf)
- Bill 44 Zoning Change Summary Table (647 KB) (pdf)
- Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 3964 (redlined version to show changes) (2.6 MB) (pdf)
- Timeline - Bill 44 Implementation (92.9 KB) (pdf)
Key Dates
-
December 07 2023
-
June 04 2024
-
June 19 2024
-
June 30 2024
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends